کاهش عدم قطعیت در یک مدل نیمه توزیعی هیدرولوژیکی با روش GLUE

1.Abbaspour, K.C. 2007. User manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs. Eawag, Swiss Fed. Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Dubendorf, Switzerland.

2.Abbaspour, K.C., Faramarzi, M., Seyed Ghasemi, S., and Yang, Y. 2009. Assessing the impact of climate change on water resources in Iran. J. Water Resour. Res. 45: 1-16.

3.Akhavan, S., Abedi-Koupai, J., and Mousavi, S.F. 2010. Application of SWAT model to investigate nitrate leaching in Hamadan–Bahar Watershed, Iran. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 139: 675-688.

4.Arabi, M., Govindaraju, R.S., and Hantush, M.M. 2007. A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices. J. Hydrol. 333: 459-471.

5.Arefi Asl, A., Najafine Zad, A., Kiyani, F., and Salman Mahini, A. 2013. Watershed runoff and sediment simulation using the SWAT model in Golestan Province Chehelchay. J. Range Water. 3: 433-446. (In Persian)

6.Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., and Williams, J.R. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment – Part 1: Model development. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc.34: 73-89.

7.Bates, B.C., and Campbell, E.P. 2001. A Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall–runoff modeling. Water Resources Research. 37: 937-947.

8.Beven, K.J. 2001. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling-The Primer. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 360p.

9.Beven, K.J., and Binley, A.M. 1992. The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes. 6: 279-298.

10.Blasone, R.S., Vrugt, J.A., Madsen, H., Rosbjerg, D., Robinson, B.A., and Zyvoloski, G.A. 2008. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Advance in Water Resource. 31: 648-630.

11.Burba, G.G., and Verma, S.B. 2005. Seasonal and interannual variability in evapotranspiration of native tall grass prairie and cultivated wheat ecosystems, Agriculture. Forest Meteorological. 135: 190-201.

12.Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W. 1988. Applied hydrology, International Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

13.Dowlatabadi, S., and Zomorodian, M. 2013. Hydrological Simulation of Firoozabad Basin by SWAT. J. Irrig. Water Engin. 14: 38-48. (In Persian)

 14.Fontaine, T.A., Cruickshank, T.S., Arnold, J.G., and Hotchkiss, R.H. 2002. Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). J. Hydrol. 262: 1-4. 209-223.

15.Freer, J., Beven, K.J., and Ambroise, B. 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoffprediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resources Research. 32: 2161-2173.

16.Gassman, P.W., Sadeghi, A.M., and Srinivasan, R. 2014. Applications of the SWAT model special section: overview and insights. J. Environ. Qual. 43: 1-8.

17.Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H., and Arnold, J.G. 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. Trans. ASABE. 50: 4. 1211-1250.

18.Geza, M., and McCray, J.E. 2008. Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. J. Environ. Manage. 88: 393-406.

19.Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P.O. 1998. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resources Research. 34: 751-763.

20.Hantush, M.M., and Kalin, L. 2005. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of runoff and sediment yield in a small agricultural watershed with KINEROS2. Hydrol. Sci. J. 50: 6. 1151-1172.

21.Jin, X., Xu, C.Y., Zhang, Q., and Singh, V.P. 2010. Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. Hydrol. J. 383: 147-155.

22.Kabir, A., and Bahremand, A.R. 2013. Study uncertainty of parameters of rainfall-runoff model (WetSpa) by Mont Carlo method. J. Water Soil Cons. 20: 5. 81-97. (In Persian)

23.Kannan, N., White, S.M., Worrall, F., and Whelan, M.J. 2007. Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for Hydrological modeling in SWAT-2000. J. Hydrol. 332: 456-466.

24.Kavian, A., Golshan, M., Rouhani, H., and Ouri, S. 2014. Assessment of Physiographic Characteristics Effect on SWAT Model Performance: A Case Study of Haraz Catchment. International Bulletin of Water Resources and Development. 1: 3. 184-193. (In Persian)

25.Lidén, R., and Harlin, J. 2000. Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates. J. Hydrol. 238: 231-240.

26.Liu, Y., and Gupta, H. 2007. Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework. Water Resources Research. 43: 1-18.

27.Mantovan, P., and Todini, E. 2006. Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol. 330: 368-381.

28.Moussa, R. 2008. Significance of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency measure for linear rise and exponential recession in event based flood modeling. Geophysical Research. EGU-A-08369. 10-2.

29.Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., and Williams, J.R. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Theoretical Documentation. Texas, USA, 661p.

30.Osmani, H., Motamed Vaziri, B., and Moini, A. 2013. Discharge simulation, calibration and validation of model SWAT, Tehran Latyan Dam area. J. Engin. Water. Manage. 2: 134-143. (In Persian)

31.Salmani, H., Mohseni Saravi, M., Rouhani, H., and Salaegheh, A. 2013. SWAT model to simulate the performance evaluation and ParaSol program (Qazaqli Watershed, Golestan). Iran Watershed Science and Engineering. 22: 1-14. (In Persian)

32.Sanadhya, P., Gironas, J., and Arabi, M. 2014. Global sensitivity analysis of hydrologic processes in major snow-dominated mountainous river basins in Colorado. Hydrology Process. 28: 9. 3404-3418.

 33.Sellami, H., Jeunesse, L.A., Benabdallah, S., Baghdadi, N., and Vanclooster, V. 2014. Uncertainty analysis in model parameters regionalization: a case study involving the SWAT model in Mediterranean catchments (Southern France). Hydrology Earth System Science. 18: 2393-2413.

34.Shen, Z.Y., Chen, L., and Chen, T. 2012. Analysis of parameter uncertainty in hydrological and sediment modeling using GLUE method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Hydrology Earth System Science. 16: 121-132.

35.Shope, C.L., Maharjan, G.R., Tenhunen, J., Seo, B., Kim, K., Riley, J., Arnold, S., Koellner, T., Ok, Y.S., Peiffer, S., Kim, B., Park, J.H., and Huwe, B. 2014. Using the SWAT model to improve process descriptions and define hydrologic partitioning in South Korea. Hydrology Earth System Science. 18: 539-557.

36.Singh, V., Bankar, N., lunkhe, S.S., Bera, A.K., and Sharma, J.R. 2013. Hydrological stream flow modelling on Tungabhadra catchment: parameterization and uncertainty analysis using SWAT CUP. Current Science. 104: 9. 1187-1199.

37.Sloan, P.G., Morre, I.D., Coltharp, G.B., and Eigel, J.D. 1983. Modeling subsurface stromflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds. Water Resources Research. 20: 12. 1815-1822.

38.Smith, P.K., and Daren Harmel, R.D. 2007. Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling. Hydrol. J. 337: 326-336.

39.Spruill, C.A., Workman, S.R., and Taraba, J.L. 2000. Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watershed using the SWAT model. Soil and Water Division of ASAE. 98: 05-109. 1431-1440.

40.Van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., and Srinivasan, R. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J. Hydrol. 324: 10-23.

41.Van Griensven, A., Ndomba, P., Yalew, S., and Kilonzo, F. 2012. Critical review of SWAT applications in the upper Nile basin countries. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16: 3371-3381.

42.Viola, F., Noto, L.V., Cannarozzo, M., and La Loggia, G. 2009. Daily streamflow prediction with uncertainty in ephemeral catchments using the GLUE methodology. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. 34: 701-706.

43.Vrugt, J.A., Gupta, H.V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S. 2003. A shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resources Research. 39: 8. 1-14.

44.Williams, J.R. 1969. Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients. Transactions of the ASAE. 12: 1. 100-103.