شبیه‌سازی نفوذ آب در خاک با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Hydrus1D و داده‌های صحرایی

1.Abbasi, F., Simunek, J., Feyen, J., van Genuchten, M.Th., and Shouse, P.J. 2003. Simultaneous inverse estimation of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters from transient field experiments: homogeneous soil. Trans. ASAE, 46: 4. 1085-1095.

2.Alletto, L., Pot, V., Giuliano, S., Costes, M., Perdrieux, F., and Justes, E. 2015. Temporal variation in soil physical properties improves the water dynamics modeling in a conventionally-tilled soil. Geoderma, 243: 244. 18-28.

3.Asgarzadeh, H., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Dexter, A.R., Mahboubi, A.A., and Neyshabouri, M.R. 2014. Determination of soil available water for plants: consistency between laboratory and field measurements. Geoderma, 8: 20. 226-227.

4.Bourgeois, O., Bouvier, C., Brunet, P., and Ayral, A. 2016. Journal of Hydrology. Inverse modeling of soil water content to estimate the hydraulic properties of a shallow soil and the associated weathered bedrock. 541: 116-126.

5.El-Nesr, N.M., Alazba, A.A., and Simunek, J. 2014. HYDRUS simulations of the effects of dual-drip subsurface irrigation and a physical barrier on water movement and solute transport in soils. Irrigation Science, 32: 111-125.

6.Fuladipanah, M. 2012. Sensitivity analysis of one dimensional hydrodynamic fully coupled model. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 12: 11. 1471-1476.

7.Ghaiumi Mohammadi, H., and Nurbakhsh, F. 2007. Detailed soil survey of Chahar-Takhteh Agricultural research station (Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province). Technical report,
No 6399. 27p. (In Persian)

8.Ghorbani Dashtaki, Sh., Homaee, M., Mahdian, M.H., and Kouchakzadeh, M. 2009.
Site-dependence performance of infiltration models, Water Resour. Manage. 23: 2777-2790.

9.Hopmans, J.W., Simunek, J., Romano, N., and Durner, W. 2002. Simultaneous determination of water transmission and retention properties. Inverse methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. (J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, Eds.). SSSA Book Series
No. 5. Pp: 963-1008.

10.Ines, A.V.M., and Droogers, P. 2002. Inverse modelling in estimating soil hydraulic functions: a Genetic Algorithm approach. Hydrol. Earth System Science, 6: 49-66.

11.Klute, A. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1- Physical and Mineralogical Methods.
2^nd ed., Agronomy No. 9. ASA/SSSA Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 176p.

12.Lou, Y., and Ren, L. 2011. Numerical evaluation of depth effects of double-ring infiltrometers on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76: 867-875. (In Persian) 

13.Mashaiekhee, P., Ghorbani, Sh., Mosadeghee, M., Shirani, H., Panahee, M., and Noori, M. 2016. Soil hydraulic parameters estimation by using double ring data. J. Water Soil Res.
74: 7. 818-820. (In Persian)

14.Mirzaee, S., Zolfaghari, A.A., Gorji, M., Miles Dyck, M., and Ghorbani Dashtaki, S. 2013. Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes Arch. Agron. Soil Science.

15.Nakhaei, M., and Simunek, J. 2014. Parameter estimation of soil hydraulic and thermal property functions for unsaturated porous media using the HYDRUS-2D code. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 62: 1. 7-15.

16.Pollalis, E.D., and Valiantzas, J.D. 2015. Isolation of a 1D infiltration time interval under ring infiltrometers for determining sorptivity and saturated hydraulic conductivity: numerical, theoretical, and experimental approach. J. Irrig. Drain. Engin. 141: 2.

17.Ramos, T.B., Simunek, J., Goncalves, M.C., Martins, J.C., Prazeres, A., and Pereira, L.S. 2012. Two-dimensional modeling of water and nitrogen fate from sweet sorghum irrigated with fresh and blended saline waters. Agric. Water Manage. 111: 87-104.

18.Raoof, M., and Pilpayeh, A.R. 2013. Estimating soil wetting profile under saturated infiltration process by numerical inversion solution in land slopes. Middle East J. Sci. Res. 13: 6. 732-736.

19.Rashid, N.S.A., Asker, M., Tanaka, T., Simunek, J., and van Genuchten, M.Th. 2015. Inverse estimation of soil hydraulic properties under oil palm trees. Geoderma, 241: 306-312.

20.Russo, D., Bresler, E., Shani, U., and Parker, J.C. 1991. Analysis of infiltration events in relation to determining soil hydraulic properties by inverse problem methodology. Water Resource Research, 27: 1361-1373.

21.Simunek, J., and van Genuchten, M.Th. 1996. Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic properties from tension disc infiltrometer data by numerical inversion. Water Resource Research, 32: 9. 2683-2696.

22.Simunek, J., Wendroth, O., and van Genuchten, M.Th. 1998. Parameter estimation analysis of the evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
62: 894-905.

23.Simunek, J., Sejna, M., and van Genuchten, M.Th. 1999. The HYDRUS-2D software package for simulating the two-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media, version 2.0, IGWMC-TPS-70, International Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colo.

24.Simunek, J., Sejna, M., and van Genuchten, M.Th. 2012. HYDRUS: model use, calibration and validation. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 55: 4. 1261-1274.

25.Tiago, B., Ramos, M.C., Goncalves, J.C.M., Van Genuchten, M.Th., and Pires, F.P. 2006. Estimation of Soil Hydraulic Properties from Numerical Inversion of Tension Disk Infiltrometer Data. Vadose Zone J. 5: 2. 684-696.

26.Toomanian, N. 2009. Detailed soil survey of Khoor and Biabanak (Naiin). Technical report. No, 654: 100. (In Persian)

27.US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources and Conservation Service. 2005. National Engineering Handbook, Part 623, Surface Irrigation. National Technical Information Service, Washington, DC, Chapter 4.

28.Vanclooster, M., Javaux, M., and Lambot, S. 2007. Recent advances in characterizing
flow and transport in unsaturated soil at the core and field. Estudios de la Zona No Saturada del Suelo, 3: 19-35.