آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 14 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 677 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,032 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,467,666 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,609,105 |
Comparison of the Ability of Different Types of Birds to Derive Energy from Corn and Soybean Meal | ||
| Poultry Science Journal | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 13، شماره 2، شهریور 2025، صفحه 231-242 اصل مقاله (1.64 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/psj.2025.22921.2193 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Nahid Zahroojian1؛ Hossein Moravej* 1؛ Mojtaba Zaghari1؛ Saied Aminzadeh2 | ||
| 1Department of Animal Science, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 2National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study evaluated the ability of different types of birds to derive energy from corn and soybean meal (SBM) using the reference diet substitution method. The corn and SBM were combined into a reference diet at 60 and 30%, respectively. Other ingredients, including dicalcium phosphate, limestone, salt, minerals, vitamins, and amino acids, held constant across the reference and test diets. A total of 36 broiler breeder hens (Ross 308, 62 weeks old), 72 male broiler chickens (Ross 308, 35 days old) and 36 commercial layer hens (Hy-line W36, 40 weeks old) were used. The apparent metabolizable energy corrected for zero nitrogen retention (AMEn), apparent ileal digestible energy (AIDE) of corn and SBM and apparent ileal digestibility coefficient (AIDC) of nitrogen, crude fat and gross energy for whole diets were evaluated. The activities of intestinal digestive enzymes and intestinal morphology were measured and compared among the dietary treatments and birds. The AMEn of SBM for broiler breeder hens was significantly higher than that of broiler chickens and commercial layer hens (2525.50, 2215.10 and 2310.80 kcal/kg DM respectively; P < 0.05); in contrast, the corn AMEn for broiler breeder hens was lower than that of broiler chickens and laying hens (3126.67, 3382.11 and 3305.59 kcal/kg DM respectively; P < 0.05). The AIDE values of corn and SBM were not significantly different between the subjected birds (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the difference between AMEn and AIDE for both corn and SBM was not significant in any experiment (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate that broiler breeder hens have a distinct capacity for deriving energy from corn and SBM compared to broiler chickens and layer hens. This highlights the impracticality of using a single set of energy values for these feedstuffs in poultry feed formulations. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Broiler Breeder hen؛ Broiler chicken؛ Commercial layer hen؛ Apparent metabolizable energy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adedokun SA, Jaynes P, Abd El-Hack ME, Payne RL & Applegate TJ. 2014. Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal and soybean meal in laying hens and broilers. Poultry Science, 93:420–428. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2013-03495
Adeola O & Zhai H. 2012. Metabolisable energy value of dried corn distillers’ grains and corn distillers’ grains with solubles for 6-week-old broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 91: 712–718. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01889
Adeola O, Anwar MN, Abdollahi MR & Ravindran V. 2018. Age-related energy values of meat and bone meal for broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 97 (7): 2516-2524. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey100
Almiral M, Francesch M, Perez-Vendrell AM, Brufau J & Esteven-Garcia E. 1995. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and β-glucanase alter digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. The Journal of Nutrition, 125 (4): 947-955. DOI: 10.1093/jn/125.4.947
Alvarenga RR, Zangeronimo MG, Rodrigues PB, Pereira LJ, Wolp RC & Almeida EC. 2013. Formulation of diets for poultry: The importance of prediction equations to estimate the energy values. Revista Archivos De Zootecnia, 62: 1-11. DOI: 10.21071/az. v62i237.1953
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th Edition, Arlington, VA.
Barzegar S, Wu SB, Noblet J & Swick RA. 2019. Metabolizable energy of corn, soybean meal and wheat for laying hens. Poultry Science, 98: 5876–5882. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez333
Bernfeld P. 1955. Amylases, α and β, In: Colowick SP and Kaplan NO. (Eds) Meth Enzymol. New York, Academic Press. Vol. 1. Pages 149-158.
Birds AR, Croom Jr WJ, Daniel LR & Black BL. 1994. Age-related changes in jejunal glucose absorption in mice. Nutrition Research, 14(3): 411-422. DOI: 10.1016/S0271-5317(05)80179-4
Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry, 72(1-2): 248-254. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Brzek P, Ciminari ME, Kohl KD, Lessner K, Karasov WH & Caviedes-Vidal E. 2013. Effect of age and diet composition on activity of pancreatic enzymes in birds. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 183: 685–697. DOI: 10.1007/s00360-012-0731-2
Calderano AA, Gomes PC, Albino LFT, Rostagno HS, Souza RMD & Mello HHDC. 2010. Chemical and energetic composition of feedstuffs of plant origin for poultry at different ages. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(2): 320-326. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982010000200014
Cristiane RA, Duarte Maria LM, Vicentini-Paulino & Daniela FP. 2014. Digestive enzymatic responses of chickens feed-restricted and refed as affected by age. Journal of Poultry Science, 51: 289-296. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0130104
CVB Feed Table, 2011. Chemical compositions and nutritional values of feed materials. Centraal Veevoederbureau Lelystad, the Netherlands. 717p.
De Los SF, Tellez G, Farnell MB, Balog JM, Anthony NB, Pavlidi HO & Donoghue AM. 2005. Hypobaric hypoxia in ascites resistant and susceptible broiler genetic lines influences gut morphology. Poultry Science, 84: 1495–1498. DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.9.1495
De Verdal H, Mignon-Grasteau S, Jeulin C, Le Bihan-Duval E, Leconte M, Mallet S, Martin C & Narcy A. 2010. Digestive tract measurements and histological adaptation in broiler lines divergently selected for digestive efficiency. Poultry Science, 89 :1955–1961. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-813
Dourado LRB, Siqueira JC, Sakomura NK, Pinheiro SRF, Marcato SM, Fernandes JBK & Silva JHV. 2010. Poultry feed metabolisable energy determination using total or partial excreta collection methods. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 12 (2): 129-132. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-635X2010000200010
Duarte CRA, Vicentini-Paulino MLM, Buratini JrJ, Castilho ACS & Pinheiro DF. 2011. Messenger ribonucleic acid abundance of intestinal enzymes and transporters in feed restricted and refed chickens at different ages. Poultry Science, 90: 863-868. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01015
Ferrer C, Pedragosa E, Torras-Llort M, Parcerisa X, Rafecas M, Ferrer R, Amat C & Moreto´ M. 2003. Dietary lipids modify brush border membrane composition and nutrient transport in chicken small intestine. Journal of Nutrition, 133: 1147–1153. DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.4.1147
Gal-Garber O & Uni Z. 2000. Chicken intestinal aminopeptidase: Partial sequence of the gene, expression and activity. Poultry Science, 79: 41–45. DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.1.41
Gidez LI. 1973. Effect of dietary fat on pancreatic lipase levels in the rat. Journal of Lipid Research, 14: 169-177. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)36904-2
Gomide MHJ, Sterzo EV, Macari M & Boleli IC. 2004. Use of scanning electron microscopy for the evaluation of intestinal epithelium integrity. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33:1500-1505. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982004000600017
Huang KH, Li X, Ravindran V & Bryden WL. 2006. Comparison of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of feed ingredients measured with broilers, layers, and roosters. Poultry Science, 85:625–634. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.4.625
Hy-Line. 2020. Hy-Line W36 commercial layers 2020 -Management Guide.
Kadhim KK, Bakar MZA, Noordin MM, Babjee MA & Saad MZ. 2014. The enzyme activities of pancreas and small intestinal contents in the Malaysian village chicken and broiler strains. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricalture Science, 37 (2): 203-214.
Kaminska BZ. 1979. Food intake in the young chick. Food intake regulation in poultry. British Poultry Science, Ltd., Edinburg, UK (1979), pp. 199-206.
Lesson S & Summers JD. 2001. Nutrition of the chicken, 4th edition, 2001.
Liu Y, Ban B, Li P, Yan X, Li L, Liu D, Yan L & Guo Y. 2022. Metabolizable and net energy values of expanded cottonseed meal for laying hens and broiler chickens. Japan Poultry Science Association, 59: 143-151. DOI:10.2141 / jpsa.0210033
Lopez G & Leeson S. 2008. Assessment of the nitrogen correction factor in evaluating metabolizable energy of corn and soybean meal in diets for broilers. Poultry Science, 87(2): 298-306. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00276
Masood W, Khan SH, Bhatti SA & Parveen A. 2011. Comparison of sample source (excreta or ileal digesta) and age of broiler chick on measurement of apparent metabolisable energy of local feed ingredients. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39 (4): 359-366. DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2011.621534
Minitab. 2016. Statistical Software, Version 16. Minitab Incorporation, State College.
Nir I, Nitsan Z & Mahagna M. 1993. Comparative growth and development of the digestive organs and of some enzymes in broiler and egg type chicks after hatching. British Poultry Science, 34: 523-532. DOI: 10.1080/00071669308417607
NRC, National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press. Washington. 155 pp.
O’sullivan NP, Dunnington EA, Larsen AS & Siegel PB. 1992. Correlated responses in lines of chickens divergently selected for fifty-six–day body weight. 3. Digestive enzymes. Poultry Science, 71(4): 610-617. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0710610
Pishnamazi A, Pourreza J, Edriss MA & Samie AH. 2005. Influence of broiler breeder and laying hen breed on the apparent metabolisable energy of selected feed ingredients. International Journal of Poultry Science, 4(3): 163-166. DOI:10.3923/ijps.2005.163.166
Reid TKO, Gardner KE, Paglia KL, Ulans ACM, Spierling RE, Edwards MS, Lundquist TJ, McFarlane ZD, Pokharel S & Bennett DC. 2024. Evaluation of apparent metabolizable energy and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of spirulina (arthrospira platensis) in broiler chickens and laying hens. Animals, 14 (3343): 1-13. DOI: 10.3390/ani14223343
Rideau N, Nitzan Z & Mongin P. 1983. Activities of amylase, trypsin and lipase in the pancreas and small intestine of the laying hen during egg formation. British Poultry Science, 24: 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/00071668308416707
Roberts JR & Ball W. 2004. Diet type, apparent metabolizable energy and digesta viscosity in laying hens of two different ages. Proceedings - Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 16: 59-62.
Sales J & Janssens GPJ. 2003. The use of markers to determine energy metabolizability and nutrient digestibility in avian species. World's poultry science journal, 59(3): 314-327. DOI: 10.1079/WPS20030019
SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Institute Inc. 2002. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Scott TA, Silverside FG, Classen HL, Swift ML & Bedford MR. 1998. Comparison of sample source (excreta or ileal digesta) and age of broiler chick on measurement of apparent digestible energy of wheat and barley. Poultry Science, 77:456–463. DOI: 10.1093/ps/77.3.456
Shamoto K & Yamauchi K. 2000. Recovery responses of chick intestinal villus morphology to different refeeding procedures. Poultry Science, 79: 718–723. DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.5.718
Siegert W, Kuenz S, Windisch W & Rodehutscord M. 2023. Amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy of soybean meal of different origins in cecectomized laying hens. Poultry Science, 102:102580. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102580
Siriwan P, Bryden WL, Molhah Y & Annison EF. 1993. Measurement of endogenous amino acid losses in poultry. British Poultry Science, 34: 939-949. DOI: 10.1080/00071669308417654
Spratt RS & Leeson S. 1987. Determination of metabolisable energy of various diets using leghorn, dwarf, and regular broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science, 66: 314-317. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0660314
Stefanello C, Vieiraa SL, Riosa HV, Simõesa CT & Sorbarab JOB. 2016. Energy and nutrient utilization of broilers fed soybean meal from two different Brazilian production areas with an exogenous protease. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 221: 267–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.005
Svihus B. 2014. Function of the digestive system. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23: 306–314. DOI:10.3382/japr.2014-00937
Tancharoenrat P, Ravindran V, Zaefariana F & Ravindran G. 2013. Influence of age on the apparent metaboliable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 186: 186– 192. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013
Ten Doeschate RAHM, Scheele CW, Schreurs VVAM & Van Der Klis JD. 1993. Digestibility studies in broiler chickens: Influence of genotype, age, sex and method of determination. British Poultry Science, 34: 131-146. DOI:10.1080/00071669308417569
Uni Z, Noy Y & Sklan D. 1995. Posthatch changes in morphology and function of the small intestines in heavy- and light-strain chicks. Poultry Science, 74: 1622–1629. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0741622
Yaghoobfar A. 2013. Effects of bioassay and age on amino acid digestibility and metabolisable energy of soybean, sunflower and canola meals. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 3(2): 249-261.
Zelenka J. 1997. Effects of sex, age and food intake upon metabolisable energy values in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 38: 281-284. DOI: 10.1080/00071669708417987
Zhou Z, Wan HF, Li Y, Chen W, Qi ZL, Peng P, & Peng J. 2010. The influence of the amylopectin/amylose ratio in samples of corn on the true metabolizable energy value for ducks. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 157(1-2): 99-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.02.005 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 437 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 294 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب