آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 14 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 680 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,068 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,665,999 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,766,913 |
A comparative assessment of energy input-output in wheat production across different tillage systems | ||
| Environmental Resources Research | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 2، دی 2025، صفحه 207-220 اصل مقاله (943.86 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/ijerr.2025.23075.1463 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Alireza Keikha1؛ Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi* 2؛ Ahmad Mohammadi2؛ Hamed Afshari3 | ||
| 1Department of Biosystem Engineering, Tak.C., Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, ShQ.C., Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e Qods, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Food Science and Engineering, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Wheat (Triticum spp.) is a vital staple crop worldwide, essential for sustainable agriculture and food security. This study examines the energy inputs and outputs associated with wheat production, specifically comparing conventional and conservation tillage systems within the Sistan and Baluchistan province. The analysis not only highlights energy consumption but also evaluates key metrics of energy efficiency. A comparison of the two tillage methods reveals significant differences in energy usage: conventional tillage demands a total energy input of 49,612.99 MJ ha-1, while conservation tillage only requires 37,972.36 MJ ha-1. This considerable reduction in energy input illustrates the greater energy efficiency of conservation tillage, which has an energy use efficiency ratio of 5.20, compared to 3.80 for conventional tillage. Additionally, the input-output analysis indicates that conservation tillage leads to lower labor requirements, decreased machinery usage, and reduced application of chemical fertilizers and biocides. To promote the sustainability of wheat production, it is advisable for farmers in Sistan and Baluchistan to adopt conservation tillage practices. This shift can enhance energy efficiency, lower production costs, and mitigate environmental impacts. Policymakers should focus on raising awareness and providing training on conservation tillage techniques to assist in this transition. Moreover, research institutions can contribute by conducting further investigations into the long-term advantages of conservation tillage and establishing support programs to encourage farmers to embrace more sustainable practices. Lastly, the integration of technology and innovative agricultural methods can further optimize energy consumption and enhance the overall sustainability of wheat farming. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Conservation tillage؛ Energy efficiency؛ Sustainable agriculture؛ Tillage systems؛ Wheat production | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmad, N., Sinha, D.K., and Singh, K.M. 2018. Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency in Wheat: A Stochastic Production Frontier Approach. Economic Affairs. 63(3), 611-616.
Al-Falahat, A.M., Qadourah, J.A., Alrwashdeh, S.S., khater, R., Qatlama, Z., Alddibs, E., and Noor, M. 2022. Energy performance and economics assessments of a photovoltaic-heat pump system. Results in Engineering. 13, 100324.
Alhajj Ali, S., Tedone, L., and De Mastro, G. 2013. A comparison of the energy consumption of rainfed durum wheat under different management scenarios in southern Italy. Energy. 61, 308–318.
Cochran, W.G., 1977. The estimation of sample size. Sampl. Tech. 3, 72–90.
Farvardin, M., Taki, M., Gorjian, S., Shabani, E., and Sosa-Savedra, J.C. 2024. Assessing the Physical and Environmental Aspects of Greenhouse Cultivation: A Comprehensive Review of Conventional and Hydroponic Methods. Sustainability. 16(3), 1273.
Fnais, A., Rezgui, Y., Petri, I., Beach, T., Yeung, J., Ghoroghi, A., and Kubicki, S. 2022. The application of life cycle assessment in buildings: challenges, and directions for future research. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 27(5), 627-654.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Ataiee, F.S., Akram, A., and Kaab, A., 2024. Feasibility study of using photovoltaic cells for a commercial hydroponic greenhouse: Energy analysis and life cycle assessment. e-Prime-Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy. 8, 100597.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., Rafiee, S., and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. 2022. A comparative of modeling techniques and life cycle assessment for prediction of output energy, economic profit, and global warming potential for wheat farms. Energy Reports. 8, 4922–4934.
Ingrao, C., Licciardello, F., Pecorino, B., Muratore, G., Zerbo, A., and Messineo, A. 2018. Energy and environmental assessment of a traditional durum-wheat bread. Journal of Cleaner production. 171, 1494-1509.
Iqbal, J., Khaliq, T., Ahmad, A., Khan, K.S., Haider, M.A., Ali, M.M., Ahmad, N., and Rehmani, M.I.A. 2024. Productivity, profitability and energy use efficiency of wheat-maize cropping under different tillage systems. Farming System. 2(3), 100085.
Kaab, A., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., and Sharifi, M. 2023. A study of changes in energy consumption trend and environmental indicators in the production of agricultural crops using a life cycle assessment approach in the years 2018-2022. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 54(3), 1-18.
Kaab, َa., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., and Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N. 2023. Analysis of the Factors Affecting Field Waste from Sugarcane Harvesting. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization. 7(4), 11-15.
Kaab, A., Khanali, M., Shadamanfar, S., and Jalalvand, M. 2024. Assessment of energy audit and environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of barley production under different irrigation systems. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 22, 100357.
Khalaj, M., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., and Mohammad Zamani, D. 2023. Use of life cycle assessment and modeling techniques for prediction of energy-environmental indicators in different wheat production systems. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 18, 100237.
Khan, Muhammad Azam, Khan, S., Khan, M A, and Latif, N. 2010. Energy requirements and economic analysis of wheat, rice and barley production in Australia Introduction of Rain Water Harvesting in a remote area of Dera Ismail Khan District of Pakistan. View project Energy requirements and economic analysis of wheat, Soil and Environment. 29(1), 61-68.
Kumar, R., Sarkar, B., Bhatt, B.P., Mali, S.S., Mondal, S., Mishra, J.S., Jat, R.K., Meena, R.S., Anurag, A.P., and Raman, R.K. 2021. Comparative assessment of energy flow, carbon auditing and eco-efficiency of diverse tillage systems for cleaner and sustainable crop production in eastern India. Journal of Cleaner Production. 293, 126162.
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran, 2022. Annual Agricultural Statistics. www.maj.ir (in Persian).
Mohammadi Kashka, F., Tahmasebi Sarvestani, Z., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., Nadi, M., and Valipour, M. 2023. Sustainable Systems Engineering Using Life Cycle Assessment: Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Agro-Environmental Footprint. Sustainability. 15(7), 6326.
Mohseni, P., Borghei, A.M., and Khanali, M. 2018. Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production. Journal of cleaner production. 197, 937-947.
Nisar, S., Benbi, D.K., and Toor, A.S. 2021. Energy budgeting and carbon footprints of three tillage systems in maize-wheat sequence of north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Energy. 229, 120661.
Pourmehdi, K., and Kheiralipour, K., 2024. Net energy gain efficiency, a new indicator to analyze energy systems, case study: Comparing wheat production systems. Results in Engineering. 22, 102211.
Pourmehdi, K., and Kheiralipour, K. 2023. Compression of input to total output index and environmental impacts of dryland and irrigated wheat production systems. Ecological Indicators. 148, 110048.
Ray, A., Kumar, A., Rai, A., and Tripathi, S. 2018. Farm Mechanization and Energy Consumption for Different Farm Categories of Phaphamau Region. Trends Biosci, 11, 4419-35.
Saadi, H., Behnia, M., Taki, M., and Kaab, A. 2025. A comparative study on energy use and environmental impacts in various greenhouse models for vegetable cultivation. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 25, 100553.
Saglam, R., Seven, L., and Kup, F. 2020. Comparative analysis of energy input-outputs of different tillage methods in second crop corn production. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 12(2), 356-365.
Soltani, A., Rajabi, M.H., Zeinali, E., and Soltani, E. 2013. Energy inputs and greenhouse gases emissions in wheat production in Gorgan, Iran. Energy. 50, 54–61.
Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N., Rafiee, M., Kaab, A., Khanali, M., Vaziri Rad, M.A., and Kasaeian, A. 2023. Energy audit and management of environmental GHG emissions based on multi-objective genetic algorithm and data envelopment analysis: An agriculture case. Energy Reports. 10, 1507–1520.
Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N., Sharifi, M., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., and Kaab, A. 2021. Evaluating the energy use, economic and environmental sustainability for smoked fish production from life cycle assessment point of view (case study: Guilan Province, Iran). Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(38), 53833-53846.
Yang, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Li, X., Ma, P., Sun, J., Sun, Y., Ma, J., and Li, N. 2022. Comparison of energy use between fully mechanized and semi-mechanized rice production in Southwest China. Energy. 245, 123270. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 442 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 253 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب