1. Bouman, B.A., Barker, R., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T.P., Atlin, G., Bennett, J. & Fujimoto, N. (2007). Rice: feeding the billions (No. 612-2016-40554)
2. Trong Duc, T. (2006). Using GIS and AHP Technique for Land-use Suitability Analysis. International Symposium on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied Sciences, pp. 6.
3. Gass, S. & Rapcsák, T. (2004). Singular value decomposition in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 154(3), 573-584. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00755-5
4. Wang, T.C. & Chen, Y.H. (2007). Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. International Journal of Management Science. 35, 384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.07.007
5. Sepehr, A., Ekhtesasi, M. R. & Almodaresi, S. A. (2011). Development of Desertification Indicator System Base on DPSIR (Take advantages of Fuzzy-TOPSIS). Geography and Environmental Planning Journal. 45(1), 9-11 [In Persian].
6. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 95(3), 649-655. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
7. Haidaraa, I., Tahrib, M., Maananc M. & Hakdaouia, M. (2019). Efficiency of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to detect soil erosion vulnerability. Geoderma. 354, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07.011
8. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.
9. Ghodsipour, S.H. 2006. Introduction of multi criteria decisions and Analysis Hierarchical Process (AHP). Amir Kabir University Publications. 220 p [In Persian].
10. Metternicht, G. & Gonzalez, S. (2004). Modelling land cover changes: Fuzzy thresholding for the separation of change from no-change areas. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 30, 351 – 362. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.009
11. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
12. Zahedifar, M. (2023). Feasibility of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to assess the most sensitive soil attributes against land use change. Environmental Earth Science. 82, 248. doi: 10.1007/s12665-023-10934-y
13. Rezaee, L., Moosavi, A. A., Davatgar, N., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2020). Soil quality indices of paddy soils in Guilan province of northern Iran: Spatial variability and their influential parameters. Ecological Indicators. 117, 106566. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106566
14. Aama Azghadi, A., Khorassani, R., Mokarram, R. & Moezi, A. (2010). Soil fertility evaluation based on soil K, P and organic matter factors for wheat by using fuzzy logic-AHP and GIS techniques. Journal of Water and Soil. 24(5), 973-984. doi: 10.22067/jsw. V 0i0.6242. [In Persian]
15. Liu, Z., Zhou W., Shen, J., He, P., Lei, Q. & Liang, G. (2014). A simple assessment on spatial variability of rice yield and selected soil chemical properties of paddy fields south China. Geoderma. 235, 39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.06.027
16. Saito, K., Linquist, B., Atlin, G.N., Phanthaboon, K., Shirawa, T. & Horie, T. (2006). Response of traditional and improved upland rice cultivars to N and P fertilizer in northern Laos. Field Crops Research. 96, 216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.07.003
17. Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, D., White, R. E., & Li, Y. (2004). A quantitative evaluation system of soil productivity for intensive agriculture in China. Geoderma. 123(3-4), 319-331. doi: org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2004. 02. 015
18. Fayyaz, H., Yaghmaeian, N., Sabouri, A., & Shirinfekr, A. (2021). Assessing soil fertility index using Fuzzy-AHP and parametric methods for tea cultivation with different productivities. Agricultural Engineering. 44(3), 275-294. doi: 10.22055/agen.2021.38284.1613. [In Persian].
19. Kweon, G. (2012). Delineation of site-specific productivity zones using soil properties and topographic attributes with a fuzzy logic system. Biosystems engineering. 112(4), 261-277. doi: 10.1016/j. biosy stems eng. 2012. 04. 009
20. Tuncay, T., Kılıc, Ş., Dedeoğlu, M., Dengiz, O., Başkan, O., & Bayramin, İ. (2021). Assessing soil fertility index based on remote sensing and gis techniques with field validation in a semiarid agricultural ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environment. 190, 104525
21. Duru, N., Dokmen, F., Mucella Canbay, M., & Kurtuluş, C. (2010). Soil productivity analysis based on a fuzzy logic system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 90(13), 2220-2227. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4074
22. Mawale, M. V., & Chavan, V. (2024). Implementation & Simulation of Fuzzy Logic Controllers for Productivity and Fertility of Soil and Performance Evaluation of Triangular Membership Function. COMPUSOFT: An International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology, 3(09), 1098–1102.
23. Mallick, K., Sahana, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2022). Comparing Delphi–fuzzy AHP and fuzzy logic membership in soil fertility assessment: a study of an active Ganga Delta in Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30(5), 1-27. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21983-4
24. Nabavi, S. F., Yaghmaeian Mahabadi, N., & MahmoudSoltani, S. (2021). Assessment of Soil Fertility Using Fuzzy Membership Functions and AHP in Paddy Fields (Case Study: Research Fields Goldasht, Amol). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(1), 109-122. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2020.308462.668707 [In Persian].
25. Dengiz, O., Ozyazici, M.A. & Saglam, M. (2015). Multi-criteria assessment and geostatistical approach for determination of rice growing suitability sites in Gokirmak catchment. Paddy and Water Environment. 13(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10333-013-0400-4
26. Keykha, E., Fakhireh, A., Rouhani, H. & Behmanesh, B. (2021). Locating of planting project using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy logic (Case study: Maravehtappe watershed, Golestan province). Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation. 8 (17), 19-40 [In Persian].
27. Vahidi, M. (2020). Land Suitability Evaluation for Barberry and Jujube Using Parametric Method and Analytical Hierarchy Process in Alghoorat Region of Birjand. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 51(10), 2665-2680. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2020.305789.668663 [In Persian].
28. Arthur, E., Razzaghi, F. & Moosavi, A. A. (2017). Validation of water sorption-based clay prediction models for calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 180, 347–354. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201700001
29. Zahedifar, M., Dehghani, S., Moosavi, A. A. & Gavili, E. (2017). Temporal variation of total and DTPA-extractable heavy metal contents as influenced by sewage sludge and perlite in a calcareous soil. Archive of Agronomy and Soil Science. 63, 136–149. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2016.1193164
30. Ertugrul, I., & Karakasoglu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7–8), 783-795. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8
31. Kilic, O. M., Ersayın, K., Gunal, H., Khalofah, A., & Alsubeie, M. S. (2022). Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 29, 2634-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.050
32. Tofan, A. S., & Breesam, H. K. (2018). Using the Fuzzy-AHP technique for determining the key performance indicators of public construction companies in Iraq. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 9(13), 1431-1445.
33. Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory (2nd ed.). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
34. Goodarzi, A. & Dokht, H. A. (2015). Measuring the Relative Importance of Financial Ratios: An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP. International Business Management, 11(3), 81-95. doi: 10.3968/7626
35. Sener, E. & Davraz, A. (2013). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrology Journal, 21, 701-714. doi: 10.1007/s10040-012-0947-y
36. Haq, A. N. & Kannan, G. (2006). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 29, 826–835. doi: 10.1007/s00170-005-2562-8
37. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.

38. Sarmadian, F., & Keshavarzi, A. (2013). An Investigation of Fuzzy Set Theory's Efficiency in Land Suitability Assessment for Irrigated Wheat in Qazvin Province, Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Multivariate Regression Methods. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 42(2), 199-207. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2012.24348

39. Erhart, E., Hartl, W. and Putz, B. 2005. Biowaste compost affects yield, nitrogen supply during the vegetation period and crop quality of agricultural crops. European Journal of Agronomy, 23(3): 305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2005.01.002

40. Sing, M. & Sherma, S.N. (2000). Effect of wheat residue management practices and nitrogen rate on productivity and nutrient uptake of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 70, 835-839
41. Mousavi, S. A., Sarmadian, F., & Taati, A. (2017). Comparison of AHP and FAO Methods for Land Suitability Evaluation of Rainfed Wheat in Kuhin Area. Iranian Journal of Soil Research. 30(4), 367-377. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2017.109256. [In Persian].
42. Panah-Nezhad, V., Ahmadi Sani, N., & Javanmard, A. (2022). Spatial multi-criteria analysis of ecological land suitability for irrigated farming. Journal of Agroecology. 14(2), 219-233. doi: 10.22067/agry.2021.20290.0 [In Persian].
43. Tashayo, B., Honarbakhsh, A., Azma, A. & Akbari, M. (2020). Combined fuzzy AHP–GIS for agricultural land suitability modeling for a watershed in southern Iran. Environmental Management. 66(3), 364-376. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01310-8
44. Sadegh Zadeh, F., Hassantabar, S., Bahmanyar, M. & Jalili, B. (2018). Reclamation of saline- sodic soil with Clay texture using Dissolved Organic Carbon. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 8(1), 159-174. doi: 10.22069/ejsms.2018.13846.1769.
45. Gavili, E., Moosavi, A.A., & Moradi Choghamarani, F. (2018). Cattle manure biochar potential for ameliorating soil physical characteristics and spinach response under drought. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 64, 1714-1727. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1453925.
46. Gavili, E., Moosavi, A.A., & Zahedifar, M. (2019). Integrated effects of cattle manure-derived biochar and soil moisture conditions on soil chemical characteristics and soybean yield. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 65, 1758-1774. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1576864

47. Chaganti, V.N., Crohn, D.M., & Simunek, J. (2015). Leaching and reclamation of a biochar and compost amended saline- sodic soil with moderate SAR reclaimed water. Agricultural Water Management. 158, 255-265. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.016
48. Roy, S., & Abul Kashem, M. (2014). Effects of organic manures in changes of some soil properties at different incubation periods. Open Journal of Soil Science. 4, 81-86. doi: 10.4236/ojss.2014.43011
49. Tejeda, M., Garcia, C., Gonzalez, J.L., & Hernandez, M.T. (2006). Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: influence on the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 38, 1413-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.017
50. Mahmoodabadi, M., Yazdanpanah, N., Sinobas, L.R., Pazira, E., & Neshat, A. (2013). Reclamation of calcareous saline- sodic soil with different amendments: Redistribution of soluble cations within the soil profile. Agricultural Water Management. 120, 30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.08.018.