مشخصات و رده‌بندی برخی خاک‌های بادرفتی دارای لملا در مناطق خشک (مطالعه موردی: منطقه زواره، شمال شرق استان اصفهان)

1.Bockheim, J.G., and Hartemink, A.E. 2013. Classification and distribution of soils with
lamellae in the USA. Geoderma. 206: 92-100.
2.Folks, H.C., and Riecken, F.F. 1956. Physical and chemical properties of some Iowa soil
profiles with clay-iron bands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 20: 575-580.
3.Furquim, S.A.C., Coltrinari, L., Ferreira, R.P.D., Castro, S.S., and Pugliese, G.R. 2013.
Lamellae formation processes in tropical soils in southeastern Brazil. Catena. 107: 15-25.
4.Gile, L.H. 1979. Holocene soils in eolian sediments of Bailey County, Texas. Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J. 43: 994-1003.
5.Givi, J., and Sohrabi, A. 2005. The role of soil classification at phases of series level in land
suitability evaluation and yield prediction. Eurasian Soil Sci. 38: 49-54.
6.Holliday, V.C., and Rawling, J.E. 2006. Soil-geomorphic relations of lamellae in eolian sand
on the High Plains of Texas and New Mexico. Geoderma. 131: 154-180.
7.Mc Lean, E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. P 199-224, In: A.L. Page (Ed.), Methods
of soil analysis. Part 2, 2nd ed., American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of
America, Madison, WI.
8.Rawling, J.E. 2000. A review of lamellae. Geomorph. 35: 1-9.
9.Roades, J.D. 1982. Soluble salts. P 167-178, In: A.L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis.
Part 2, 2nd ed., American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America,
Madison, WI.
10.Schaetzl, R.J. 2001. Morphologic evidence of lamellae forming directly from thin clayey
bedding planes in a dune. Geoderma. 99: 51-63.
11.Schaetzl, R.J., and Anderson, S. 2005. Soil genesis and geomorphology. Cambridge
University Press, New York, 817p.
12.Schoenberger, P.J., Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C., and Broderson, W.D. 2002. Field book
for describing and sampling soils, Version 2. National Resources Conservation Service,
National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE, USA.
13.Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy. 2nd ed., Handbook No. 436, United States
Department of Agriculture and National Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC,
USA, 869p.
14.Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey
Investigations Report No. 42, Version 5.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 1001p.
15.Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12th ed., United States Department of
Agriculture and National Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC, USA, 360p.
16.Stoops, G. 2003. Guidelines for analysis and description of soil and regolith thin sections.
Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 184p.
17.Van Wambeke, A., and Forbes, T. 1986. Guidelines for using “Soil Taxonomy” in the names
of soil map units. SMSS Technical Monograph No. 10, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.,
USA, 75p.
18.Wright, J.S. 2001. “Desert” loess versus “glacial” loess: Quartz silt formation, source areas
and sediment pathways in the formation of loess deposits. Geomorph. 36: 231-256.