آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 13 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 656 |
| تعداد مقالات | 6,849 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,873,691 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,238,542 |
Expert understandings on rangeland ecosystem services and their sustainable management (Atrak River Basin, NE Iran) | ||
| Environmental Resources Research | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 2، مهر 2020، صفحه 109-120 اصل مقاله (878.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/ijerr.2020.5275 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| MS. MS. Azimi* 1؛ M. Haghdadi2؛ V. Riyazinia2؛ Z Molnár3 | ||
| 1Assistant professor, Department of Rangeland Management, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Golestan, Iran | ||
| 2M.Sc. Department of Rangeland and Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Golestan, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant professor, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Traditional Ecological Knowledge Research Group, 2163 Vácrátót, GINOP Sustainable Ecosystems Group, 8237 Tihany, Klebelsberg Kuno u. 3., Hungary. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Over the last three centuries, worldwide improper utilization of rangelands has led to degradation of ecosystem services. Rangelands, like other natural resources used by humans, are embedded in complex socio-ecological systems. To determine how to better manage this important resource, we developed a rangeland ecosystem services model using the Driver-Pressure-State-Impacts–Response (DPSIR) conceptual model. The model was tested in a river basin in north-east of Iran. We asked 56 experts and 42 local land users on their perceptions of rangeland changes, causes of change, and possible actions to mitigate impacts using Delphi method, workshops, and questionnaires. A Multi-Criteria Decision Making method was used to evaluate the perceived interactions among the components of the DPSIR framework. Climate change and rangeland degradation were the most important pressures, leading to a decline in rangeland production, decreased vegetation cover, and land-use change. Experts and locals argued that forage and herbal species production, erosion control, and flood control were the most affected ecosystem services. They suggested the use of resistant plants, local training, and rangeland rest to manage these problems. The DPSIR framework was useful in developing a comprehensive insight for local people and managers on the social and ecological complexity of rangelands and the potential responses for coping with pressures | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Rangeland management؛ MCDM؛ Pairwise comparison؛ Sustainable development | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdel-malak, F.F., Issa, U.H., Miky, Y.H. and Osman, E.A. 2017. Applying decision-making techniques to civil engineering projects. Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences. 6(4), 326-331.
Ahmadpour, A., Heshmati, G. and Julaei, R. 2016. Rangeland condition assessment based on economic criteria. Journal of Landscape Ecology. 9 (2), 83-96.
Atkins, J.P., Gregory, A.J., Burdon, D. and Elliott, M. 2011. Managing the marine environment: is the DPSIR framework holistic enough. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 28(5), 497-508.
Azimi, M., Heshmati, G.A., Farahpour, M., Faramarzi, M. and Abbaspour, K.C. 2013. Modeling the impact of rangeland management on forage production of sagebrush species in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Ecological Modelling. (250), 1–14.
Baillie, J., Hilton-Taylor, C. and Stuart, S.N. 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment. Iucn.
Boone, R.B., Conant, R.T., Sircely, J., Thornton, P.K. and Herrero, M. 2018. Climate change impacts on selected global rangeland ecosystem services. Global change biology. 24(3), 1382-1393.
Borrelli, P., Robinson, D.A., Fleischer, L.R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., Meusburger, K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B., Ferro, V. and Bagarello, V. 2017. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature communications. 8 (1), p.2013.
Borja, A., Galparsoro, I., Solaun, O., Muxika, I., Tello, E.M., Uriarte, A. and Valencia, V. 2006. The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuarine, coastal and shelf science. 66(1-2), 84-96.
Briske, D.D. ed. 2017. Rangeland systems: processes, management and challenges. Springer.
Brunson, M. 2014. Unwanted no more: land use, ecosystem services, and opportunities for resilience in human-influenced shrublands. Rangelands. 36(2), 5-11.
Catt, J. 2001. The Agricultural importance of loess. Earth Science Review. 54, 213-224.
Chan, K.M., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S. and Hannahs, N. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience. 62(8), 744-756.
EEA, 2001. Environmental Signals 2001. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
De Groot, R., Fisher, B., Christie, M., Aronson, J., Braat, L., Gowdy, J., Haines-Young, R., Maltby, E., Neuville, A., Polasky, S., Portela, R. and Ring, I. 2010. Integrating the ecological and economic dimension in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: Kumar, P. (Ed.), the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, pp. 11-40.
De Leeuw, J., Osano, P., Said, M.Y., Ayantunde, A.A., Dube, S., Neely, C. and Thornton, P.K. 2016. Pastoral farming systems and food security in sub-Saharan Africa: priorities for science and policy. Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa: Priorities for science and policy under global change. London, UK: Routledge.
De Martonne, E. 1926. A new climatological function: The aridity index. Meteorology. 2, 449-458.
Estell, R.E., Havstad, K.M. and Cibils, A.F. 2012. Increasing shrub use by livestock in a world with less grass. Rangeland Ecological Management. 65, 553-62.
FRWO (Forests, Rangeland and Watershed Organization), 2018. Rangeland rehabilitation report. 20 pp. (In Persian)
Hajipuor, S., Barani, H., Yeganeh, H. and Abdei Sarvestani, A. 2016. Factors Affecting Herders Migration Time to Summer Rangelands (Case Study: Kouhdasht Rangelands, Lorestan Province, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science. 7(3), 199-209.
GNWM (Golestan Province Department of Natural Resources and Watershed Management). 2015. Reports of Atrak river basin Project. 332 P. (In Persian).
Haines-Young, R. and Potschin-Young, M. 2018. Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5. 1): a policy brief. One Ecosystem. 3, p.e27108.
Henderson, B.B., Gerber, P.J., Hilinski, T.E., Falcucci, A., Ojima, D.S., Salvatore, M. and Conant, R.T. 2015. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 207, 91-100.
Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M.C., Thornton, P.K., Blümmel, M., Weiss, F., Grace, D. and Obersteiner, M. 2013. Biomass repuse, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(52), 20888-20893.
Hobbs, N.T., Galvin, K.A., Stokes, C.J., Lackett, J.M., Ash, A.J., Boone, R.B., Reid, R.S. and Thornton, P.K. 2008. Fragmentation of rangelands: implications for humans, animals, and landscapes. Global Environmental Change. 18(4), 776-785.
Hosseini, S.A., Khatir Namany, J. and Akbarzadeh, M. 2014. Vegetation changes in semi-steppe rangelands of Golestan province (Case study: Maraveh tapeh). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research. 21(4), 685-697. (In Persian)
Hosseinalizadeh, M., Kariminejad, N., Campetella, G., Jalalifard, A. and Alinejad, M. 2018. Spatial point pattern analysis of piping erosion in loess-derived soils in Golestan Province, Iran. Geoderma. 328, 20-29.
Jamshidi, A.R. and Amini, A.M. 2013. Evaluation of factors affecting on natural resource degradation from the viewpoint of experts management of natural resources in Ilam province. Journal of Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources. 1(4), 91-105. (In Persian)
Khan, S. and Hanjra, M.A. 2009. Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production–Global perspectives. Food Policy. 34(2), 130-140.
Khoshfar, G., Mousazadeh, H. and Khodadad, M. 2017. An analysis of the quality of life in border regions (Case study: Atrak village in Gonbad). Journal of Border Region Studies. 4(4), 51-84.
McCollum, D.W., Tanaka, J.A., Morgan, J.A., Mitchell, J.E., Fox, W.E., Maczko, K.A., Hidinger, L., Duke, C.S. and Kreuter, U.P. 2017. Climate change effects on rangelands and rangeland management: affirming the need for monitoring. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability. 3 (3), e01264.
Malekmohammadi, B. and Jahanishakib, F. 2017. Vulnerability assessment of wetland landscape ecosystem services using driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model. Ecological Indicators. 82, 293-303.
Masoodi, A., Majdzadeh Tabatabai, M.R., Noorzad, A. and Samadi, A. 2017. Effects of soil physico-chemical properties on stream bank erosion induced by seepage in northeastern Iran. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 62(16), 2597-2613.
Mianabadi, H., Mostert, E., Pandes, S. and Giesen, N. 2015. Weighted Bankruptcy Rules and Transboundary Water Resources Allocation. Journal Water Resources Management. 29, 2303–2321
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Scenarios: findings of the scenarios working group (Vol. 2). Island Press.
Mirdeilami, Z., Sepehri, A. and Barani, H. 2015. Analyzing problems of rangelands from stakeholder’s viewpoint (Case Study: Rangelands of Northeast of Iran). Journal of Rangeland Management. 2(1), 79-99.
Müller, F. and Burkhard, B. 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services. 1(1), 26-30.
Plieninger, T., Bieling, C., Fagerholm, N., Byg, A., Hartel, T., Hurley, P., López-Santiago, C.A., Nagabhatla, N., Oteros-Rozas, E., Raymond, C.M. and Van Der Horst, D. 2015. The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 14, 28-33.
Reid, R.S., Fernández-Giménez, M.E. and Galvin, K.A., 2014. Dynamics and resilience of rangelands and pastoral peoples around the globe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 39, 217-242.
Reynolds JF, Smith D. and Lambin E. F. 2007. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science. 316, 847–51.
Robinson, L.W. and Nganga, I. 2018. Participatory rangeland management toolkit for Kenya, Tool 4-1: Appreciating the Fourth Leg of PRM: Relations with government and customary institutions.
Rounsevell, M.D. and Metzger, M.J. 2010. Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 1(4), 606-619.
Saadati, S., Motevallian, S.S., Rheinheimer, D.E. and Najafi, H. 2013. Indicators for Sustainable Management of Wetland Ecosystems Using a DPSIR Approach: A Case Study in Iran. In proceeding of: 6th International Perspective on Water Resources & the Environment conference (IPWE 2013), At Izmir, Turkey.
Salmanmahiny. A.R. 2013. Golestan Province land use planning studies. Golestan Planning and Budget Organization, Report of Golestan Forest and Rangelands. 112 p.
Schmidt, K., Walz, A., Martín-López, B. and Sachse, R. 2017. Testing socio-cultural valuation methods of ecosystem services to explain land use preferences. Ecosystem Services. 26, 270-288.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M. and De Haan, C. 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Van Oudenhoven, A.P., Petz, K., Alkemade, R., Hein, L. and de Groot, R.S., 2012. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators. 21, 110-122.
Wallace, K.J. 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation. 139 (3), 235-246.
Water and Wastewater Affairs. 2010. Reports of Comprehensive Study of Climate Adaptability. 201 pp. (In Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 456 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 417 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب