بررسی شاخص‌های فیزیولوژیکی رشد و کارآیی مصرف نور در ژنوتیپ‌های مختلف بادام‌زمینی در استان گیلان

1.Smartt, J. 1994. The groundnut crop. A scientific basis for improvement. London. Chapman & Hall, 734p.

2.Safarzade Vishekaei, M.N. 2017. Effect of iron and zinc on yield and qualitative characteristics of peanut seed in Guilan province. Final report of the research project. Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch, 95p. (In Persian)

3.Maiti, R. and Ebeling P.W. 2002. The peanut (Arachis hypogaea) crop. Science Publisher, Inc. 376p.

4.Reddy, T.Y., Reddy, V.R. and Anbumozhi, V. 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant Growth Reg. 41: 75-88.

5.Pallas, J.E. and Samish Y.B. 1974. Photosyntetic response of peanut. Crop Sci. 14: 478-482.

6.Bell, M.J., Wright, G.C. and Harch, G. 1993. Environmental and agronomic effects on the growth of four peanut genotypes in a sub-tropical environment. I. Dry matter accumulation and radiation use efficiency. Exp. Agric. 29: 473-490.

7.Bell, M.J., Wright, G.C. and Hammer, G.L. 1992. Night temperature affects radiation-use efficiency in peanut. Crop Sci. 32: 1329-1335.

8.Chapman, S.C., Ludlow, M.M., Blamey, F.P.C. and Fischer, K.S. 1993. Effect of drought during early reproductive development on growth of cultivars of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.): I. Utilization of radiation and water during drought. Field Crops Res. 32: 193-210.

9.Collino, D.J., Dardanelli, J.L., Sereno, R. and Racca, R.W. 2001. Physiological responses of Argentine peanut varieties to water stress, light interception, radiation use efficiency and partitioning of assimilates. Field Crops Res. 70: 177-184.

10.Craufurd, P.Q., Vara Prasad P.V. and Summerfield, R.J. 2002. Dry matter production and rate of change of harvest index at high temperature in peanut. Crop Sci. 42: 146-151.

11.Gardner, F.P. and Auma, E.O. 1988. Canopy structure, light interception, yield and market quality of peanut genotypes as influenced by planting pattern and planting date. Field Crop Res. 20: 13-29.

12.Duncan, W.G., McCloud D.E., McGraw R.L. and Boote, K.J. 1978. Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Sci. 18: 1015-1021.

13.Bennett, J.M., Sinclair, T.R., Li, M.A. and Boote, K.J. 1993. Single leaf carbon exchange and canopy radiation use efficiency of four peanut cultivars. Peanut Sci. 20: 1-5.

14.Matthews, R.B., Harris, D., Williams, J.H. and Nageswara Rao, R.C. 1988. The physiological basis for yield differences between four genotypes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in response to drought.: II. Solar radiation interception and leaf movement. Exp. Agric. 24: 203-213.

15.Williams, J.H. 1992. Concepts for the application of crop physiological models to crop breeding. In: Groundnut- A global Perspective: Proceeding of an International Workshop., 25-29 Nov 1991, ICRISAT Asia Centre, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh.

16.Hammer, G.L. and Wright, G.C. 2000. A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 45: 3. 575-589.

17.Kiniry, J.R., Simpson, C.E., Schubert, A.M. and Reed, J.D. 2005. Peanut leaf area index, light interception, radiation use efficiency and harvest index at three sites in Texas. Field Crops Res. 91: 297-306.

18.Rosati, A., Metcalf, S.G. and Lampinen, B.D. 2004. A simple method to estimate photosynthetic radiation use efficiency of canopies. Ann. Bot. 93: 567-574.

19.Bell, M.J. and Wright, G.C. 1994. The N₂-fixing capacity of peanut cultivars with differing assimilate partitioning characteristic. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 45: 1455-1468.

20.Monteith, J.L. 1977. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems, J. App. Ecol. 9: 747-766.